The software development world is growing at a rapid pace. Software QA testing tools are needed to keep up with the ever-changing technology landscape and new features being developed every day.
The software development world is growing at a rapid pace. Software QA testing tools are needed to keep up with the ever-changing technology landscape and new features being developed every day. There are various QA testing tools available, but not all of them offer the same features. Before choosing a tool, make sure it offers these three essential features:
A few features to look for when choosing a testing tool!
A QA tester has to be very organized, and that's why they need to have all the required information at their fingertips. A good QA testing tools helps testers stay on top of things by organizing all the data, reports, and bugs in one place. Not only this, there are a lot more features that a QA testing tool offers:
1. Tracking and tracing capabilities: It's no surprise that QA testers want to have the ability to trace their work. This gives you accountability along with a wealth of data that can be used for future projects. Good software will allow you to track requirements through testing and make sure defects are completed in a timely fashion. The testing process should be documented to ensure that there is a clear line between requirement, test case, defect, and test cycle. This will prevent blame games by documenting who was responsible for the tests and what they were supposed to test. When creating a relationship between requirements and test cases, you need to ensure that this relationship is clear. It doesn't matter whether you have one requirement in multiple or multiple requirements in a single test case. If there is repetition, then making this relationship explicit will save time.
2. Control Structure: The absence of control structures such as loops and conditional clauses was one of the fundamental drawbacks of early record-and-playback tools. If a script author needed to repeat an action more than ten times, he or she would need to record that action ten times and keep track of each one separately. There was no support for such logic if there were numerous viable alternatives within a step and the test author wanted to do one action if a given condition was true and a different action if it was not. To regulate the flow of scripts in coding automation frameworks, testers employ loops and if-else clauses. If the project is to be scalable, codeless solutions must meet this need.
3. Smart element locators: Automation scripts that are not updated to match the application can result in automation failure. Testers need to choose a tool that will be able to adapt over time. Ideally, there should be no disruption in the continued execution of scripts as an application evolves.
The opportunity to use codeless or non-coded solutions over coded frameworks is an advantage because the tester can gather multiple locators during recording. If one of those locators can no longer be found during playback, other locators for that element are tried. This gives the tester a better chance to develop stable scripts without needing much maintenance.Conclusion: We hope the aspects mentioned above will help you choose the best quality assurance tool for your QA testing needs. If you are looking for a good QA testing tool, make sure to check out ACCELQ now.
Can’t donate? Please share. Even a quick share on Facebook can help.
The average share raises $97.